• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

Deliberative Citizenship Initiative

Building Democracy One Conversation at a Time

  • The Initiative
    • Programs
      • Deliberation Across the Curriculum
      • Deliberation on Campus
      • Deliberation in the Community
      • Research on Deliberation
    • Motivations
      • Why Deliberative Citizenship?
      • Why Davidson? Why Now?
    • Who’s Involved?
      • DCI Fellows Cohorts
        • 2025-2026 Fellows
        • 2024-2025 Fellows
        • 2023-2024 Fellows
        • 2022-2023 Fellows
        • 2021-2022 Fellows
        • 2020-2021 Fellows
      • DeeP Collaborative Cohorts
        • 2024-2025 DeeP Collaborative Faculty
        • 2023-2024 DeeP Collaborative Faculty
      • Advisory Council
    • History
      • What Sparked the Initiative?
    • Key Deliberative Dispositions
    • Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
    • Annual Report
  • Get Involved!
    • Participate in a Forum
    • Join a D Team
    • Become a Fellow
    • Take Courses
    • Get Training
    • Come to Guest Lectures
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
      • 250th Anniversary Deliberative Forum Series on American Values
    • Past Events
  • Connections
    • The Deliberative Citizen: The DCI’s Monthly Newsletter
    • Efforts on Campus
    • Efforts in the Community
    • Efforts Elsewhere
    • Readings and Resources
      • DCI-Published Guides
      • DCI Guide to One-on-One Conversations
      • How to Disagree
      • Demonstration of Facilitation Styles
      • Deliberative Pedagogy Mini-Course
    • How We Can Help: DCI’s LET’S DELIBERATE! Partnership Opportunities
    • DCI in the News
  • DCI Blog Posts
    • Recent Blog Posts
    • All Blog Posts

2024-2025

Campus Conversation on the Honor Code

Honor and academic integrity were the focus of a campus conversation co-hosted by the Deliberative Citizenship Initiative (DCI), Honor Council, Student Government Association (SGA), and the Office of the Vice President of Student Life. Over 50 students, faculty, and staff gathered to deliberate about how a more robust culture of academic integrity can be created at Davidson. Held on Thursday, March 27 from 5:00 to 7:00 PM in the Lilly Gallery, the event complemented the Celebration of Honor held earlier in the month.

As participants got their plates of food provided by Much Ado Catering, the forum began with a presentation about the honor code from the Chair and Vice Chair of the Honor Council. Participants were quickly invited to dive into roundtable discussions guided by the DCI’s fellows and a deliberation guide written by the event’s student organizers, DCI Senior Fellow and Co-Convener LJ Phillips ’25 and DCI Fellows Isabella Neri ’27 and Cavan Klein ’27 (shown left).

You can check out the deliberation guide below, which provides some useful background about the nature of academic integrity, Davidson’s Honor Code, current perceptions of campus academic culture, and ideas for improving that culture in the future.

Honor-Code-Deliberation-Guide

The organizers of the event – LJ Phillips ’25, Isabella Neri ’27, Cavan Klein ’27, and DCI Faculty Director Graham Bullock – have collated, analyzed, and discussed the input that participants provided via the survey we distributed after the event. They endeavored to capture the participants’ thoughts and suggestions in the document below, “Campus Conversation Report: Resources for Continued Engagement on the Honor Code.”

Like the DCI’s pathways guides that the DCI distributes after each of its deliberative forums, the report includes ideas for moving forward on the topic of the event. Options for learning more and getting more connected and involved with regard to the honor code are included for your consideration.

This document has been shared with the Honor Council, Student Government Association, the Dean of the Faculty’s Office, the President’s Office, and the Dean of Student’s Office as they consider different ways to build a more robust culture of academic integrity at Davidson. It has also been shared with attendees of the honor code forum. Our hope is that it stimulates further discussions and well-considered actions that address the concerns and questions that have been raised about academic integrity within the Davidson community.

Check out the report below!

Campus-Conversation-Report_The-Honor-Code

DCI x WALT Collaboration!

Earlier this spring, a representative from Davidson’s student radio station, WALT, reached out to the DCI about hosting an hour-long show on the station. It could highlight the work of the DCI, discuss the challenges and opportunities of deliberation — whatever we thought might be interesting to WALT audiences. If it went well and people were interested, it could serve as a pilot for a regular show in the coming academic year. Several DCI Fellows were interested in trying it out, and so they quickly pulled together a plan at the end of the semester — actually, for a show that was broadcast on the last day of the semester, and it went really well. Especially for the first time the DCI hit the radiowaves!

DCI Fellows Grace Zagoria ’27 and Zak Abdulahi ’27 served as hosts of the show. They talked about their own experiences facilitating conversations as part of the DCI’s Forums and D Teams, and they interviewed several other fellows about their experiences. Fatima Mukasa ’28 talked about how much she enjoyed serving as a fellow as a first-year student and as an international student from Uganda. And Valeriia Kruzhkova ’26, a junior from Ukraine, also talked about her experience as both a fellow and senior fellow with the DCI.

The hosts also interspersed some of their favorite music throughout the show, along with some fun banter among themselves along the way. Check out the full episode below, and let us know if you think we should do a regular show at dci@davidson.edu:

Free Expression at Davidson

On April 23, the Deliberative Citizenship Initiative hosted a Deliberative Forum on “Free Expression at Davidson: Rights and Responsibilities during an Uncertain Time.” The forum was the last DCI event to be held in the Lilly Gallery before it is transformed into a study space for the next two years while the library is renovated. A total of 144 people attended the event; 61 in-person and 83 online.

Jim Martin speaking to the audience.
Jacquie Pffeffer Merrill at the podium.

Like most past DCI forums, this event included both expert speakers and an opportunity for the audience to engage with one another on the topic. But instead of a panel or roundtable discussion, this time the speakers spoke sequentially to freely express their thoughts about free expression.

Stacey Riemer at the podium.

The speakers included Melissa Gonzalez (Associate Professor of Hispanic Studies, Gender & Sexuality Studies and Latin American Studies), Dan Layman (Associate Professor of Philosophy), Jim Martin ’57 (Former Davidson Associate Professor of Chemistry and Former Governor of North Carolina), Ike Bailey ’95 (Professor of the Practice in Communication Studies), Jacqueline Pfeffer Merrill (Director of the Campus Free Expression Project, Council of Independent Colleges) and Stacey Riemer (Interim Vice President for Student Life and Dean of Students). The event was moderated by Graham Bullock, Associate Professor of Political Science and Faculty Director of the DCI.

Melissa Gonzalez speaking to the audience.

Following the speakers’ remarks, audience members began talking with each other around roundtables in person and in breakout rooms online. Following the DCI’s deliberation guide written for this forum (provided below) and guided by the DCI’s trained facilitators, the discussions explored three related themes and questions:

  1. The Nature and Importance of Freedom of Expression: Why do we value it in a democratic society and in higher education?
  2. The Nature of Responsible Freedom of Expression: What are reasonable limits on our right to “free speech?”
  3. Davidson College’s Approach to Freedom of Expression and the Student Code of Responsibility: How does and how should the College respond to concerns about the expression of particular viewpoints on campus?

Feedback from the event was very positive. 92% of respondents to the post-event survey left either somewhat or very hopeful that we can identify at least some areas of agreement on the importance of free expression and reasonable limits on free speech, 94% reported being satisfied or very satisfied with their small group discussion and likely to participate in another Deliberative Forum in the future, and 97% stated they were likely or highly likely to recommend participating in a Deliberative Forum to a friend.

deliberators sitting around tables.

Below are some of the comments that participants shared about their experience at the forum:

  • “I am really proud to know my alma matter is thinking about this and proactively encouraging discussion. I am proud to be a Davidson Alumni.” Conservative Female Participant
  • “I applaud you for including an ideologically diverse panel. Though I did not agree with one of the members, it was such a great model of civil discourse! Thank you to Dr. Bailey for his inspiring message to us all!! The event was fantastic, and our small group deliberation was a joy. Thank you to the DCI for this Deliberative Forum! Thanks to the deliberation guide, panel, and small group deliberation, I learned much about the topic, as well as how to deliberate together. Deliberative Forums are a very worthy investment in time personally and for our communities and society.” Liberal Female Participant
  • “It’s refreshing and encouraging to see an institution of higher learning actively solicit opinions from and engage with a diverse group of students, faculty, alumni, parents, and friends.  It speaks to the philosophy of the College…a philosophy from which many other institutions could stand to learn.” Moderate Male Participant
  • “I enjoyed participating with other thoughtful, intelligent people of varying ages as they discussed a difficult topic.” Conservative Male Participant
  • “Thank you for hosting this important event, and for the broad range of speakers on the panel.  Our small group was well-facilitated by a current student, who set clear parameters, included everyone, and kept the conversation moving.  The advance reading provided a good foundation while also being an accessible length. Institutions of higher learning have a powerful opportunity and responsibility right now to protect freedom of speech and it is heartening to know how Davidson is striving to stand up for free speech in our current cultural climate. It was refreshing to reconnect with Davidson by learning about the topic of free speech from faculty, staff, and alumni who offered a broad range of perspectives.  I am encouraged to see how carefully this topic is being considered on campus and appreciate the opportunity to connect with others in the structured small group discussion.”  Moderate Female Participant
  • “I thought our moderator was excellent and mature for a sophomore. The organization of the subject matter was great. The diversity of the panel was better than I expected. Being a conservative I did not expect my views to be heard or accepted. I was pleasantly surprised and considered the opposition well formed. I would have enjoyed further discussion.” Conservative Male Participant
  • “How we do anything matters as much as what we do. The DCI brings people together and teaches us how to be deliberative and how to be an effectively engaged citizen, skills that have application across a wide spectrum of critical issues. While I (as a Davidson parent) benefit personally from the wealth of information and opportunities the DCI offers, what I most appreciate is this opportunity for students. The DCI is supporting Davidson’s statement of purpose in countless way, both directly and indirectly.” Liberal Female Participant

Participants were also invited to like to share any other comments, suggestions, or questions about free expression at Davidson that they would like the College to take into consideration in its approach to managing the tensions around protecting freedom of expression and promoting belong and mutual respect. Responses to this question are included in the document below.

DCI-Forum-on-Free-Expression-Participant-Responses

Check out the recording of the speakers’ remarks, deliberation guide, pathways guide and more photos from the event below.

DCI Deliberation Guide on Free Expression at Davidson

DCI-Free-Expression-Deliberation-Guide

Deliberators deliberating around tables.

DCI Pathways Guide on Free Expression at Davidson

DCI-Free-Expression-At-Davidson-Pathways-Guide

Three tables of deliberators.

The Power of Historical Narratives and Contested Histories

Every spring, the DCI Fellows implement personal deliberation projects in which they organize deliberations on topics they are interested in. This year DCI Fellow Bosisso Charles Takougnadi (aka TBC) had a big idea for his project — he wanted to partner with the history department to host a forum on historical narratives and contested histories.

Picture of panelists at history forum

This would be a challenging enterprise for a history major, but even as a biology major, TBC was undaunted. He reached out to the chair of the History Department, John Wertheimer, and they worked together to design an innovative event titled, “The Power of Historical Narratives and Contested Histories.” This panel-based deliberative discussion was designed to explore the ways historical narratives are constructed, contested, and interpreted in contemporary society. The event focused on how history is told, who gets to tell it, and how differing perspectives shape our understanding of the past and present.

DCI Fellow TBC, the main organizer of the event, introducing the panel.
DCI Fellow TBC, the main organizer of the event, introducing the panel.

This “Deliberative History Forum” — to our knowledge, the first of its kind at Davidson — was held on April 8, 2025, on the campus of Davidson College, and lasted approximately 120 minutes. The first 45 minutes was dedicated to remarks by a panel of Davidson history professors that included History Professors Jonathan Berkey, Jakub Kabala, Hilary Green, Dáša Mortensen, and John Wertheimer. The remaining 75 minutes was reserved for small group table discussions among the audience members. The panelists joined the conversations, which included approximately 30 students, faculty, and community members. The event was hosted in the New Football Stadium’s Gallery 18, which provided a communal space that worked well for both the panel and the small-group discussions.

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is PXL_20250408_213656618-1024x768.jpg

The event opened with brief remarks from each panelist, who shared insights into how history can be framed through different political, social, and cultural lenses. Each discussed the forum’s topic based on their academic expertise, which ranged from the histories of the Middle East, medieval Europe, the United States, and East Asia. Their remarks helped set the stage for the audience’s deliberations together.

Audience discussing forum topic together around tables.

Following the panel, participants gathered around five tables for facilitated small-group discussions. Due to a shortage of DCI-certified facilitators, several attendees who had experience participating in D Teams stepped up to guide these conversations, which proved successful and enriching. Key topics of discussion included the role of historians in shaping public memory, how marginalized voices are often excluded from or misrepresented in mainstream narratives, and the impact of historical interpretation on present-day policies and identities.

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is PXL_20250408_222707626-1024x768.jpg

Following the event, many expressed appreciation for the format and content of the event, especially the opportunity to engage with peers and faculty in meaningful dialogue. Participants also enjoyed the provided food (dinner from local restaurant Sabi), which helped create a welcoming and friendly atmosphere.

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is PXL_20250408_222718816-1024x768.jpg

Overall, the project was a successful effort in fostering thoughtful dialogue on a timely and important subject. It demonstrated the value of collaborative, interdisciplinary events in building civic awareness and critical thinking among members of the campus community.

Deliberating About the Legacies of War

Luna Noguchi ’25 (DCI Fellow)

On March 5, the DCI invited students, faculty, and staff together to a forum entitled “Lessons of War, Prospects for Peace: What should we say about the legacies of World War II in the Asia-Pacific region?” It served to provide some historical background for the Ginkgo trees planted in Spring 2024 between Chambers, Wall, and the Library. Co-sponsored with the History Department, East Asian Studies Department, Political Science Department, and the Office of the Vice President of Academic Affairs (VPAA), the event presented the history of World War II in the Asia Pacific with attention to historical controversies, while encouraging reflection on the universal human cost of war beyond regional or political divisions. 

photo of Dr. Multhaup presenting

The Ginkgo trees were contextualized with informative presentations from Dr. Kristi Multhaup, Dr. Dáša Mortensen, and Dr. Keren Zhu. Dr. Multhaup, whose research focuses on memory, outlined the lasting memory of WWII in the Asia Pacific and her initiative to bring the Ginkgo trees to campus during her participation in the ASIANetwork in Japan in 2016. Dr. Mortensen provided a broad historical perspective of the war in the region, shedding light on the atrocities that occurred. Dr. Zhu gave a presentation on the causes and consequences of war through an international relations perspective. The presentations provided participants with a nuanced and inclusive understanding of the complexities of war. Participants also had the opportunity to watch a compilation of testimonials provided by survivors of WWII from across the Asia-Pacific region in a video created by Keya Zhou ’25, one of the event’s organizers.

photo of tables at event

In the second half of the event, participants — over dinner provided by local pan-Asian restaurant Sabi with support from the VPAA’s office — engaged in deliberations facilitated by DCI Fellows and guided by a deliberation guide (see below) developed by the event’s organizing team. The goal was to discuss the legacies of WWII in the Asia Pacific and foster meaningful conversation about the inhumanity of war’s moral atrocities. The forum was also intended to generate ideas for interpretive materials for the Ginkgo trees. As the discussions proceeded, fellows asked participants to write their ideas on post-it notes, stick them to a large sheet of paper, and explain their thought processes. Fellows made notes on the paper and moved the post-it notes around to indicate shared conclusions. Online participants shared their thoughts using Zoom’s whiteboard function in their breakout rooms.

Over 35 Davidson students, faculty, staff, community members, and alumni attended the event (24 in person and 14 online), and they included participants who had ties to countries throughout the region. The organizing team, which consists of Keya Zhou ’25, Luna Noguchi ’25, Flo Moser ’26, Romeo Norris ’27, Casey Scheiner ’28, Lily Ogawa ’28, and Dr. Graham Bullock, is currently in the process of collating and synthesizing the comments and ideas from both the post-it notes and submissions made to an anonymous online form that was shared with the participants. They will incorporate this input from the Davidson community into a proposal for how to introduce and contextualize the Ginkgo trees that have been planted on campus. Stay tuned for more info coming soon!

DCI-WWII-in-the-Asia-Pacific-Deliberation-Guide

  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Page 4
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

Blog Post Categories

  • Announcements
  • Blog Posts
  • DCI Posts
  • Events
  • Faculty Posts
  • Fellow Posts
Image of a compass superimposed by the text "Deliberative Citizenship Initiative" and "Davidson College." Clicking on this image leads to the Initiative page.

Recent DCI Blog Posts

  • We Tried to Fix Jubilee’s “Middle Ground” – Here’s How It Went
  • A Case for Deliberation in the Natural Sciences
  • Welcoming New Staff to the DCI and DCN
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn



Copyright © 2026 · Infinity Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in